Overview
Performance optimization involves tuning system parameters to achieve the best balance between speed, accuracy, reliability, and battery life for your specific application.Goal: Maximize navigation performance while maintaining safety and reliability. Trade-offs exist between speed, smoothness, and computational load.
Optimization Objectives
Speed
Max velocity, fast acceleration
- Reduces mission time
- May sacrifice smoothness
- Higher battery drain
Accuracy
Precise positioning, tight tolerances
- Reaches goals exactly
- May be slower
- Better for manipulation tasks
Efficiency
Low CPU/battery usage
- Longer operation time
- May limit features
- Essential for long missions
Robustness
Handles errors, recovers well
- Fewer failures
- May be conservative
- Critical for unattended operation
Navigation Performance
Velocity Limits
Balance speed vs. safety:| Priority | max_vel_x | max_speed_xy | acc_lim_x | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speed | 0.7-1.0 | 0.8-1.0 | 3.0-4.0 | Fast but jerky |
| Balanced | 0.4-0.6 | 0.5-0.7 | 2.0-2.5 | Good compromise |
| Smooth | 0.2-0.4 | 0.3-0.5 | 1.0-2.0 | Slow but smooth |
| Safety | 0.2-0.3 | 0.3-0.4 | 1.0-1.5 | Very conservative |
Path Planning Optimization
Faster path computation:Controller Optimization
Trajectory sampling:- ↑
PathAlign.scale: Follows global path more strictly - ↑
GoalDist.scale: Prioritizes reaching goal quickly - ↓
BaseObstacle.scale: Less conservative, may get closer to obstacles - ↑
BaseObstacle.scale: More cautious, larger clearance
Costmap Optimization
Reduce computational load:- Smaller
inflation_radius: Faster planning, tighter spaces, higher collision risk - Larger
inflation_radius: Safer, slower planning, may not fit through gaps
Computational Optimization
CPU Usage
Identify bottlenecks:-
Reduce controller samples:
-
Lower costmap resolution:
-
Reduce update frequencies:
-
Disable unused features:
-
Use hardware acceleration (if available):
Memory Usage
Monitor memory:-
Smaller maps:
-
Limit costmap size:
-
Reduce bag recording:
Network Optimization
Reduce WiFi bandwidth:-
Use compressed image transport:
-
Reduce topic rates:
-
Use wired connection if possible:
Odometry Accuracy
Wheel Calibration
Precise wheel radius:- Commanded: 5.0m
- Measured: 5.2m
- Error: +4%
- Old radius: 0.050m
- New radius: 0.050 * (5.2 / 5.0) = 0.052m
EKF Tuning
Sensor trust (process noise):- Odometry jumps/drifts → Increase IMU weight (reduce IMU variance)
- Rotation inaccurate → Check IMU calibration first
- Position drifts over time → Normal for wheel odometry, use SLAM/AMCL correction
Battery Life
Power Consumption Breakdown
Typical current draw (12V system):| Component | Current | Power | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raspberry Pi 5 | 1.5-2.5A | 18-30W | Higher during computation |
| LiDAR (RPLIDAR A1M8) | 0.5A | 6W | Constant |
| 4× Motors (idle) | 0.2A | 2.4W | Low when stationary |
| 4× Motors (moving) | 2-4A | 24-48W | Higher during acceleration |
| Total | 4-7A | 50-86W | Varies with operation |
- Battery: 3S 5000mAh (12V, 60Wh)
- Average power: 60W
- Runtime: ~60 minutes
Improve Battery Life
1. Reduce motor power:- 5000mAh → 10000mAh (double runtime)
- Ensure weight distribution balanced
Localization Performance
AMCL Tuning
Particle count vs. accuracy:- ↓ Particles: Faster but less robust localization
- ↑
laser_max_beams: More accurate but slower
SLAM Toolbox Performance
If using SLAM for localization:Benchmark Testing
Performance Metrics
Measure and track:| Metric | Target | How to Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Max Speed | 0.5-0.7 m/s | Time to traverse 10m straight |
| Nav Success | >90% | 10 goals, count successes |
| CPU Usage | <70% | top during navigation |
| Memory | <2GB | free -h |
| Battery Life | >45 min | Continuous operation test |
| Localization Error | <0.1m | Compare map TF to ground truth |
Benchmarking Script
Optimization Checklist
Before vs. After Comparison
Baseline (conservative defaults):- Max velocity: 0.3 m/s
- Success rate: 95%
- CPU: 60%
- Battery: 60 minutes
- Max velocity: 0.6 m/s (2× faster)
- Success rate: 92% (acceptable drop)
- CPU: 70% (acceptable)
- Battery: 50 minutes (trade-off)
- Max velocity: 0.3 m/s (same)
- Success rate: 95% (same)
- CPU: 45% (↓25% reduction)
- Battery: 80 minutes (↑33% improvement)
Next Steps
Maintenance Guide
Keep robot running reliably long-term
Final Demo Prep
Perfect your demonstration
Navigation Testing
Systematic performance validation
Troubleshooting
Solve performance issues